A swashbuckling adventure that never takes itself too seriously, Anthony Hope's The Prisoner of Zenda is packed with intrigue, backstabbing, bravery and romance.The Prisoner of Zenda is a historical adventure novel, published in 1894, written by Anthony Hope. Rassendyll, who bears an uncanny resemblance to the monarch, is persuaded to impersonate him in order to stop his villainous half-brother, Prince Michael, from seizing the throne. That night, the king is abducted and held prisoner in a castle in the small town of Zenda.
The story of Prisoner of Zinda contains many interesting thoughts and events, as it is the author's belief that various details of the way to enter politics are presented. Rudolph was different from his brother in appearance and character, and Rudolph believed that having a lot of money and a good position in society meant that he did not have to work, but his brother Robert believed that his position in society had responsibilities, and furthermore, Rudolph had red hair because he Long ago, one of his relatives, Countess Amelia Rassendel, married a member of the royal family, who was famous for her red hair and various other things.Details of the story of the prisoner ZendaOne of the most important details of the story of the prisoner of Zenda and Rudolph lied to his family about going on a walking tour in the Alps, and through what was actually shown was going to Ruritania to attend the coronation of the new king Rudolf V, and he lied because he did not want his family to stop him, and on his way to Ruritania He spent a day in Paris where he met two old friends: George Featherly who worked at the embassy, and Bertram Bertrand who was a famous journalist in Paris, and George Rudolph told about Antoinette de Maupan, who was known for her wealth and ambition, and the story of the prisoner of Zenda is presented through other details.Summary and details of the story of the prisoner of Zenda:And it can add to the Duke of Streslow, Duke Michael, the half-brother of the King of Ruritania, and the Duke was the favorite son of his father, and he returned to Streslow to make preparations for the coronation of his brother, and the next day, Rudolf Racendel boarded the train to Dresden, as was Antoinette de Mauban in the same train. In Dresden, as well as the story of a prisoner of Zenda, Rudolf and Antoinette de Mauban took another train to Ruritania.When they reached the Romanian border, guards checked their passports. They were very surprised to see Rudolph looking just like a king. Rudolph stopped in Zenda, a town near the border, because all hotels in the capital, Strelau, were full.Likewise, the story of the prisoner of Zenda shows the case of De Mopan on the train for her trip to the capital, and Rudolph stayed in a hostel run by an old woman and her two daughters, and other things that this old lady, the owner of the hostel, loves dearly, loves Duke Michael and wished that he would be the king instead of his brother, and others In the story Prisoner Zenda.Likewise, Duke Michael always lived in Ruritania and he cared about people, so people loved him, but his brother Rudolf Elfberg was abroad for most of his life and many people did not know how he looked, and he liked hunting and so on.
He saves the day first by impersonating the abducted King (a very distant relation) for the coronation ceremony, and then by rescuing him from the Castle of Zenda. An idle English gentleman, Rudolf Rassendyll, visits Ruritania, a small, German-speaking, mittel-European state, where he becomes caught up in political scheming and falls in love with the lovely princess Flavia. Ruritania made its debut in Hope’s fast-paced bestseller of 1894, The Prisoner of Zenda, which creates a blueprint for dozens of similar narratives. The location of this semi-feudal territory is always a little vague, shifting from Germany in the 1890s, to the Balkans in the early-twentieth century, to the French Alps in the 1950s. Since the 1890s, Ruritanian backdrops have been reworked for a variety of purposes, from Balkan spy novels, to interwar operetta, to Cold War satires, in such fictional territories as Ixania, Krasnia, and Grand Fenwick.The imaginary setting of Ruritania takes shape in the late–nineteenth-century imagination as a realm of romance and swashbuckling, a space for old-fashioned adventure in a modernizing world. English and later American protagonists stumble into plot-driven narratives that usually feature some combination of schemes against the throne, doubles or mistaken identities, swordplay, and love at first sight.
Indices of the popular success of the novel include parodies and even a game. The Pall Mall Gazette likewise noted that the hero is a “modern young man … yet the adventures which befall him would put those of ‘Arthur’s Knights’ into the shade” (“Reviews: Two Novels”). The Times admired the way Hope “interpolates a medieval romance in the civilization of the nineteenth century,” creating in the process a “singular mixture of epochs “: “no tale of adventure in far-off, mysterious countries surpasses the strange excitements this story of the three months spent by an English gentleman in the petty kingdom of Ruritania, in Germany” (“Recent Novels”). Although the novel is set in the recent past, swordplay is more common than gunplay, adding to the curiously timeless, or more accurately heterochronic atmosphere, in which different time periods seem to coexist. The most impressive of these villains is the devil-may-care Rupert of Hentzau, who returns as a thorn in the Ruritanian side in Rupert of Hentzau (1898). Much of the entertainment takes the form of clashes between the ever-resourceful Rassendyll and the henchmen of the King’s half-brother and arch-enemy, Black Michael.
This shift was a question of changing literary tastes, but it was also a question of gender politics. Hope’s tale appeared as part of a more general sea-change in late-Victorian fiction that saw the adventure romance vie with the domestic novel for popularity. Its swashbuckling aspect originated with such romans de cape et d’épée as Alexandre Dumas’s Three Musketeers (1844) and the model for its colorful German principality probably include Robert Louis Stevenson’s Prince Otto (1885), set in tiny Grünewald, and perhaps even Jacques Offenbach’s La Grande-Duchesse de Gérolstein (1867), the first of many operettas with Ruritanian settings.
The novel’s celebration of an heroic English spirit was also, of course, consonant with the imperial and jingoist tendencies of the period (Dawson, Deane, Kestner 153-58).The Prisoner of Zenda is one of those books whose success was tightly bound up with its adaptation for the stage (Baroness Orczy’s The Scarlet Pimpernel is another from this period). Ruritania was at least in part, then, a backward-looking, imaginary heterotopia for Britain, and an antidote to the supposedly hysterical strains of modern literature that Max Nordau had attacked in Entartung (1892 translated as Degeneration in 1895). Andrew Lang, for instance, in an attack on “New Woman” writers Sarah Grand and “Iota” suggested that readers would do better to turn to Hope and others who represented “the good old tendency to love a plain tale of adventure, of honest loves and fair fighting” (“Tendencies” 160). Rider Haggard, Stanley Weyman, and others offered visions of heroic masculinity and yielding femininity that were very different from those depicted in contemporary “New Woman” fiction, in the naturalist novel, or in the “problem plays” that followed in the wake of Ibsen’s success.
James’s had long been a venue for the more progressive end of British theatre, including such plays as Arthur Wing Pinero’s The Second Mrs Tanqueray (May 27, 1893) in 1895 Oscar Wilde’s The Importance of Being Earnest had premiered there, before the first of Wilde’s three trials. James’s Theatre, the actor-manager George Alexander transformed Rose’s Zenda into a lavish romantic spectacle, and turned himself into a matinée idol in the triple part. (Thus the lead actor actually plays three roles: Rudolf Rassendyll Rudolf III, and Rudolf V.) In London at the St.
Hackett in the lead, it became a lucrative stage swashbuckler, and toured the country for years. Sothern and then the athletic James K. On the other side of the Atlantic, the stage impresario Daniel Frohman acquired the rights, and The Prisoner of Zenda opened in New York on 4 September 1895. James’s was refurbished in 1900 its new telegraphic address was “Ruritania” as a tribute to the play that paid for the lavish remodeling (Duncan 256). This turned out to be a profitable change of direction, with Alexander making some £18,000 from the Zenda production. While both plays depend on confusions over identity, the subversive playfulness of Earnest was out the more “traditional” heroic masculinity of romantic melodrama was in.
Hackett’s performance in The Prisoner of Zenda was embalmed for all time in 1913, when cinema impresario Adolph Zukor of the Famous Players Film Company persuaded the ageing star to reprise his performance for the very first five-reel U.S. As with the novel, some critics saw this strain of melodrama as a healthy trend: “on the stage, as in the literary world, there is at present a great revulsion from the problem plays and problem stories of the past ten years towards a fresh and healthy romanticism” (“Music and Drama” 3).Ruritania moved fairly seamlessly from stage to screen. Hackett’s dashing performance in Zenda and similar fare played no small part in the rise of the swashbuckler as hero: sword in hand “he first showed that the up-to-date hero must needs be able to exterminate a dozen enemies alone and single-handed” (“Extravagant Heroics”).
Grier’s An Uncrowned King, Samuel Gordon’s The Queen’s Quandary (1903), Percy Brebner’s Princess Maritza (1906), and Louis Tracy’s A Son of the Immortals (1912). In Britain these included Sydney C. Dozens of novels in the Ruritanian vein were published in the 1890s and early twentieth century. There has been no significant film version since then.Apart from adaptations, The Prisoner of Zenda has also inspired countless imitations. Sound-era versions have included the 1937 Prisoner of Zenda, which featured Ronald Colman and Madeleine Carroll a 1952 adaptation, which is essentially a color remake of the previous film, with Stewart Granger and Deborah Kerr and a 1979 comedy, featuring Peter Sellers and Lynne Frederick. A British version with Henry Ainley in the lead followed in 1915, but the most lavish of the silent-era films is Rex Ingram’s stylish production, which starred Lewis Stone as Rudolf, Alice Terry (Mrs Ingram) as Flavia, and Ramon Novarro as the wonderfully wicked Rupert of Hentzau.
In the Academy of October, 1906, a reviewer calculated that there were by then “probably a hundred” novels of this type, and as a result the trope had “become stale,” but despite, or perhaps because of this familiarity, they continued to appear for years to come. The term “Ruritanian romance” was in use by the early 1900s to describe the new subgenre, in which protagonists found themselves happily ensnared in political and romantic intrigues in such territories as Gerisau, Ehrenfelberstein, Hohenphalia, Montara, Grimland, Montalba, and Scarvania. Homer’s Count Tezma (1901), Sydney Grundy’s The Garden of Lies (1905) and James Bernard Fagan’s Hawthorne, U.S.A. Ruritanian romances on the London stage included A.N.
0 kommentar(er)
